Har Karkom has nothing to do with the Biblical Mt. Sinai. A few geological similarities do not make a convincing case. When you look at the objective evidence, well publicised; in the book “Where Moses Stood”, several documentaries, lectures, and support from other scholars, it becomes patently clear that the true location of the Biblical Mount Sinai is nowhere near where Professor Anati claims.
Robert Feather a8oct@btinternet.com
Har Karkom has nothing to do with the Biblical Mt. Sinai. A few geological similarities do not make a convincing case. When you look at the objective evidence, well publicised; in the book “Where Moses Stood”, several documentaries, lectures, and support from other scholars, it becomes patently clear that the true location of the Biblical Mount Sinai is nowhere near where Professor Anati claims.
Robert Feather a8oct@btinternet.com