RSS


Newest Article: “Balderdash!: A Dozen Critically Flawed Biblical Scholarship Views Destined Deservedly for the Dust Bin—Part II”
Written by Paul N. Anderson
If the Gospel of John were totally theological, with no mundane or historically grounded content, that would be telling, but such is not the case. John possesses more topographical and archaeologically verified content than all the gospels combined—canonical and otherwise.
See… Read More

 

 

Recent Articles
RSS

Leviticus 19:18 Does Not Mean “Love Everyone”: Why I Disagree with Richard E. Friedman
Written by Hector Avalos
Early Muslims and the Bible
Written by Martin Whittingham
Reading the Fourth Gospel in India
Written by Johnson Thomaskutty
The Sisters of Nazareth Site
Written by Ken Dark
Jesus from Outer Space?
Written by Richard Carrier
Concerning Gen 2:21, Retrodiagnosis, and Methodology in Scriptural Study: A Response to Hector Avalos
Written by Ziony Zevit
“Balderdash! A Dozen Critically Flawed Biblical Scholarship Views Destined Deservedly for the Dust Bin—Part I”
Written by Paul N. Anderson
Reading the New Testament in Israeli State Education
Written by Orit Ramon
Religious Innovation and Sacred Scriptures in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch
Written by Lydia Gore-Jones
A Penis Bone in Genesis 2:21? Retrodiagnosis as a Methodological Problem in Scriptural Studies
Written by Hector Avalos
More Articles