Textual 'corrections' are always a 'reach around'. Making up texts that don't actually exist in order to bolster arguments which ignore the text itself as it does exist has always smacked, to me, of dishonesty.
It treats the text dishonestly and advances conclusions that are dishonest.
Textual 'corrections' are always a 'reach around'. Making up texts that don't actually exist in order to bolster arguments which ignore the text itself as it does exist has always smacked, to me, of dishonesty.
It treats the text dishonestly and advances conclusions that are dishonest.