All reputable historians acknowledge that the person "Jesus of Nazareth" actually existed, was the leader of a so-called Jewish Cult that challenged the legitimacy of the Roman occupation, and that this person was crucified. Three points that are non-contentious amidst the rhelms of academia. It follows therefore that there will exist texturalised writings which expand upon these truths - and these are the biblical writings. Some are to be taken literally i e. The Gospels, which puport to account for the biographical life of "Jesus", while other texts are books of consideration to assist the reader in comprehending the eternal devine mystery (oft referred to as being one-with-the-cosmos). To suggest the the man "Jesus" did not exist in reality is to deny the acadekic historians and scientific archeologists who have proven beyond doubt that he and his followers were actual real historical beings.
All reputable historians acknowledge that the person "Jesus of Nazareth" actually existed, was the leader of a so-called Jewish Cult that challenged the legitimacy of the Roman occupation, and that this person was crucified. Three points that are non-contentious amidst the rhelms of academia. It follows therefore that there will exist texturalised writings which expand upon these truths - and these are the biblical writings. Some are to be taken literally i e. The Gospels, which puport to account for the biographical life of "Jesus", while other texts are books of consideration to assist the reader in comprehending the eternal devine mystery (oft referred to as being one-with-the-cosmos). To suggest the the man "Jesus" did not exist in reality is to deny the acadekic historians and scientific archeologists who have proven beyond doubt that he and his followers were actual real historical beings.