The remarks made by April Hooper really caught my attention: "Look at all the zealots on here"? Perhaps not realizing that you may be coming across as a zealot yourself? You assert that science is correct because it evolves with new evidence? If it changes, doesn't that imply it was not correct to begin with? Science is not infallible; it's crucial to approach all scientific assertions with a critical mindset and acknowledge that our understanding is always in flux. Regarding the Bible and religion, these are distinct entities. All humans are fallible, and we have countless religions, all of which are human creations. Why is that? Because we cannot reach a consensus. However, some parts of the biblical text have indeed been corroborated by archaeological findings.
Christian denominations, which are man-made, often disagree and do not strictly adhere to the Bible. Over the centuries, they have incorporated pagan traditions, effectively apostasizing.
The term 'GOD' is a title, not a name. Don't we typically provide our 'names' after our comments? So-called Christian religions must be worshipping a 'Title', while non-Christian faiths interestingly have specific names for their deities?
December serves as a prime example of how far 'Christianity' has strayed from the 'truth'. All Christmas celebrations slavishly followed by Christianity are rooted in earlier pagan customs. There is no definitive date established for the birth of Jesus Christ. For those acquainted with the 'Bible', the text explains that it is his death, rather than his birth, that is the focal point of the gospel's message. However, they do not even have the correct date for what is they name as ‘Easter’, also Pagan in it’s origin.
The remarks made by April Hooper really caught my attention: "Look at all the zealots on here"? Perhaps not realizing that you may be coming across as a zealot yourself? You assert that science is correct because it evolves with new evidence? If it changes, doesn't that imply it was not correct to begin with? Science is not infallible; it's crucial to approach all scientific assertions with a critical mindset and acknowledge that our understanding is always in flux. Regarding the Bible and religion, these are distinct entities. All humans are fallible, and we have countless religions, all of which are human creations. Why is that? Because we cannot reach a consensus. However, some parts of the biblical text have indeed been corroborated by archaeological findings.
Christian denominations, which are man-made, often disagree and do not strictly adhere to the Bible. Over the centuries, they have incorporated pagan traditions, effectively apostasizing.
The term 'GOD' is a title, not a name. Don't we typically provide our 'names' after our comments? So-called Christian religions must be worshipping a 'Title', while non-Christian faiths interestingly have specific names for their deities?
December serves as a prime example of how far 'Christianity' has strayed from the 'truth'. All Christmas celebrations slavishly followed by Christianity are rooted in earlier pagan customs. There is no definitive date established for the birth of Jesus Christ. For those acquainted with the 'Bible', the text explains that it is his death, rather than his birth, that is the focal point of the gospel's message. However, they do not even have the correct date for what is they name as ‘Easter’, also Pagan in it’s origin.