I really enjoyed reading this article. I clearly am not a scholar and particularly not a Bible scholar. So, take this comment as trying to understand. It seems to me the author used a very circular argument in agreeing (at the end) with Wescott and Hort by referencing, several times, " Western Non interpolation" which is a term coined by Hort. That, from my understanding of debate, is not a valid form of substantiation?
I really enjoyed reading this article. I clearly am not a scholar and particularly not a Bible scholar. So, take this comment as trying to understand. It seems to me the author used a very circular argument in agreeing (at the end) with Wescott and Hort by referencing, several times, " Western Non interpolation" which is a term coined by Hort. That, from my understanding of debate, is not a valid form of substantiation?