You said that they put an unpublished book review online, but actually I believe that putting a book review online is considered publishing it, even if it is free and no one peer-reviewed it. The second you put it online, it is published, so I don't know what you mean by the book review being unpublished. I am not trying to start an argument. I know that scholars are sticklers for details, so I am pointing this out as an interesting little detail. I know it is not the most important detail, but I thought it is interesting anyway.
You said that they put an unpublished book review online, but actually I believe that putting a book review online is considered publishing it, even if it is free and no one peer-reviewed it. The second you put it online, it is published, so I don't know what you mean by the book review being unpublished. I am not trying to start an argument. I know that scholars are sticklers for details, so I am pointing this out as an interesting little detail. I know it is not the most important detail, but I thought it is interesting anyway.